April 27th, 2024

Lougheed’s wisdom wasn’t followed by succeeding Conservative premiers

By Letter to the Editor on December 10, 2018.

Re: “Facts speak the truth on past PC governments,” Dec. 5

I want to thank Jim Taylor for taking the trouble to respond to my letter in last Saturday’s paper. Mr. Taylor, however, apparently missed the point I was making, so I am pleased for the opportunity to be able to revisit my concerns.

My point was that the leadership of at least one Progressive Conservative premier, Peter Lougheed, showed significant foresight and prudence. He warned his public of the need to put significant amounts of oil based revenue into a Heritage Trust Fund. His intention, as I mentioned, was to avoid the kinds of volatility disasters that have plagued this province in the last 30 years.

Had his suggestions been heeded by those PCs who followed, it is likely that two results would have changed the history and the fortunes of many Albertans. First, workers would have been better protected against the vicissitudes of the markets and would have been helped in preparing for alternative employment, and second, alternative energy projects would have prepared Albertans for the world of 2018.

Premiers after Lougheed did not share his wisdom nor his foresight. Instead they abandoned future-oriented leadership and took the low road. I do not think I am overstating when I say that successive PC governments self-servingly bought the voting public through artificially low taxes and the absence of a sales tax. Of course the people didn’t object. We’ve all been trained to bark at increased taxes. But sometimes governments are asked to lead, and not just to appease the people and mollify investors. Successive PC governments failed to lead. They own the mess the province is in today.

Mr. Taylor seems to suggest that it is the dreaded equalization payments that account for the differences in the Savings Funds of Alberta ($17 billion) and Norway ($1,100 billion). I simply have to, apologetically, call that one of the dumbest arguments I’ve heard. Please, Mr. Taylor, if the word “Canada” means anything to you, you need to stop whining about equalization payments. Of course that might be a little too much to ask.

Peter Mueller

Medicine Hat

Share this story:

9
-8
Subscribe
Notify of
1 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Fedup Conservative
Fedup Conservative
5 years ago

The Noway savings is $1,100 Trillion, Alaska $66 billion, and you are right to call it a dumb argument as we know, it has nothing to do with why this province is broke. Oilmen state that it’s too bad Klein and Stelmach along with their supporters weren’t smart enough to listen to Peter Lougheed. What did they think would happen? They deliberately slash royalties and taxes to benefit their rich friends and created a gold rush situation with our oil offering the world our oil at a fraction of value, but weren’t smart enough to create a way to get it out of this province to the foreign markets. As oilmen point out their stupidity has caught up to us and now Notley is forced to have to deal with it,, and as she busts her butt trying to fix the mess they created for us she has to endure their sarcastic remarks hurled at her, while they blame her for it. It really proves how ignorant these people are, doesn’t it?.