Wason, Troy

By Scott Schmidt on September 29, 2025.

News profile

1. What are your thoughts on city ownership of Saamis Solar, and what direction would you want to see council take with ownership of renewables?

Medicine Hat’s Saamis Solar project could offer new opportunities for the city’s energy future. Renewable energy shows promise, but the project’s future development is still open for discussion.

The city might consider different approaches, such as full municipal ownership, partnerships with private companies, or a combination of both. Each option could bring benefits and challenges, especially regarding costs, control, and community value.

It may be wise for the city to take a cautious approach. This could involve moving forward in stages and assessing progress along the way. Gathering more public input and studying how the solar project fits with Medicine Hat’s existing energy resources, including natural gas, would also be important.

Flexibility could be key as the city navigates changes in technology, economy, and regulations. Ideally, council would weigh options carefully and listen to community concerns before making any major decisions.

An open and measured discussion might help find a balanced path forward for renewable energy in Medicine Hat that fits the city’s unique needs and priorities.

2. What are your thoughts on the future of the energy division, specifically the concept of turning it into a municipally controlled corporation?

The future of Medicine Hat’s energy division is a key issue, and the idea of creating a Municipally Controlled Corporation (MCC) has generated plenty of debate. While the model has potential, it is not a step the city should take without careful consideration and clear public input.

Public ownership has long kept rates affordable, ensured accountability, and provided revenue for city services. But circumstances are changing. Local gas production is declining, regulations are more complex, and nearly half a billion dollars in infrastructure upgrades are on the horizon.

An MCC could offer advantages such as professional oversight, flexible governance, and better financing options, while keeping assets in public hands. However, there are real risks. Concerns include reduced transparency, higher costs, and weakened democratic control. Many residents worry that ownership could eventually slip away.

I believe the best path forward is to maintain direct city ownership while strengthening accountability. Tools such as a citizen-led Rate Review Committee and independent reviews can ensure utilities remain affordable, reliable, and reinvested back into Medicine Hat.

The MCC discussion will likely return in the future. Any decision then should be guided by proven benefits and our community values, not ideology or urgency.

3. How would you look to balance taxation with the operation costs of running a city, as well as the services provided to residents?

Balancing taxation with the costs of running Medicine Hat means keeping services strong while ensuring residents are not weighed down by rising property taxes. Since municipalities rely mostly on property tax revenue, every dollar collected must be managed wisely to deliver visible value back to the community.

Good financial management starts with careful budgeting and long-term planning. The city must regularly review spending, cut waste, and focus on projects that make the biggest impact. Core services such as public safety, road maintenance, recreation, and transit must be protected to keep Medicine Hat safe and vibrant.

Diversifying revenue is also key. That includes pursuing provincial and federal grants, forming local partnerships, and encouraging economic growth that strengthens the tax base. A broader economy means less pressure on existing taxpayers.

Transparency is equally important. Residents deserve to understand how their tax dollars are spent and to feel confident that their priorities shape council’s decisions. With efficiency, accountability, and steady investment, Medicine Hat can keep taxes fair while preserving the quality-of-life people expect.

4. How would you approach economic development and any need to incentivize business to come to Medicine Hat?

Medicine Hat’s future depends on building a strong, welcoming environment where businesses want to invest and where our community truly benefits. I believe economic development must begin with strengthening the basics: fair utility rates, straightforward permitting, and solid infrastructure.

Incentives are not just about dollars but about supporting businesses that share our values. I support targeted incentives that help companies hire locally, train apprentices, and grow in industries like clean energy and agriculture technology. But incentives must come with clear commitments.

At the same time, we cannot forget our small and medium-sized businesses. I want to see more support for local entrepreneurs through training, access to capital, and connections that help them succeed and stay here at home. Partnerships with Medicine Hat College and community groups can help prepare our workforce and spark innovation.

5. With the proposed north-side location for a permanent homeless shelter off the table following public concerns, what do you think are the essential priorities that a shelter location must provide?

Choosing the right spot for Medicine Hat’s permanent homeless shelter is about meeting real needs with practical solutions, while keeping the community involved every step of the way.

First, a good shelter location should be easy to reach. People need access to health care, addiction services, and job supports. Being close to public transit and downtown resources makes a world of difference.

Safety matters for everyone, including residents and neighbours. This means selecting a site away from schools and playgrounds when possible and having strong security measures in place.

Community involvement is essential. Before any decisions are made, the public should have the chance to share their thoughts and concerns. The best shelter sites respect both the needs of people using the shelter and those living nearby.

The main goal should be helping people move quickly from shelter to stable housing, not adding to visible social problems. Running a shelter well requires reliable funding, good management, and strong partnerships with police and social agencies.

Finally, the shelter should be part of a balanced approach so that no single neighbourhood must carry the entire burden. With these priorities, Medicine Hat can build a shelter that offers hope and help while respecting the interests of the whole community.
6. A lot of focus during this election campaign has been on property taxes in Medicine Hat, though a majority of residents do not own property. What can or should the city be doing to ease cost-of-living issues for those who do not own property, such as renters?

This election has focused on property taxes, but most Medicine Hat residents are renters. The city needs to do more for those who do not own homes.

Expanding rent assistance programs can provide direct support to tenants facing rising costs. Increased funding and eligibility would help more families and individuals who rent.

Encouraging new affordable rental housing by offering incentives for developers, such as tax breaks and reduced fees, will grow housing options and help keep rents in check.

Keeping utilities, transit, and recreation fees affordable is also important. Medicine Hat’s low utility rates help everyone save on essential expenses.

The city should partner with community groups and other governments to expand emergency support and renter protections.

Supporting renters makes Medicine Hat more affordable and secure for everyone, not just homeowners.
7. What are your thoughts on proposed recreational facilities such as the Southside Outdoor Aquatics Centre and Brier Run Sports Field? How much focus would you want the city to put toward adding recreational facilities?

Medicine Hat’s proposed Southside Outdoor Aquatics Centre and Brier Run Sports Field reflect strong community demand for updated recreation. Residents see these projects as key to strengthening local spirit and providing active living options for all ages.

Recent feedback shows wide public support, especially as older amenities have closed and southern neighbourhoods grow. Costs are a concern, and these projects might increase property taxes unless outside funding comes through. Careful financial planning is essential.

Council should prioritize recreation, guided by common sense and community input. Outside grants and public feedback must shape decisions to ensure new facilities are truly needed and sustainable.

In short, recreation helps attract new families and supports healthy, vibrant communities. With smart planning, Medicine Hat can build what people want without straining city finances.

Share this story:

40
-39
Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments