As the COVID-19 pandemic sent oil prices plumeting to historic lows, emails show Newfoundland and Labrador was quietly bracing for two of its offshore oilfields to be abandoned by their owners. The Terra Nova FPSO is shown anchored in Conception Bay, Newfoundland and Labrador on Friday, October 23, 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Paul Daly
ST. JOHN’S, N.L. – As the COVID-19 pandemic sent oil prices plummeting to historic lows, emails obtained by The Canadian Press show Newfoundland and Labrador was quietly bracing for two of its offshore oilfields to be abandoned by their owners.
And as the province watches those same companies this year report staggering profits, experts say fossil fuel-producing provinces like Newfoundland and Labrador should get used to the whiplash – and use it to better protect themselves.
“We’re going to see more situations where companies have a record profit one year and are completely busted the next year,” said Warren Mabee, director of the Institute for Energy and Environmental Policy at Queen’s University in Kingston, Ont. “Governments need to learn to work with that, and to turn it to their advantage.”
Before the pandemic hit in early 2020, shutting down any of the four oilfields pumping off the province’s east coast was a distant consideration. But by May of 2020, emails obtained through access to information legislation show government officials were already preparing for Suncor and Husky Energy to walk away from projects that would keep their respective oilfields – Terra Nova and White Rose – operating for years to come. (Husky has since merged with Cenovus.)
“Based on the current economics and uncertainty, it is likely the asset life extension will not proceed,” said government presentation notes on Suncor’s Terra Nova oilfield, dated June 30, 2020. “Much uncertainty as to when things will return to normal or what ‘the new normal’ will look like.”
The notes said the province would take a $6.5-billion hit to its gross domestic product over the next decade if Suncor abandoned Terra Nova.
By the fall of 2020, the documents show, Suncor was rethinking Terra Nova, and Cenovus was threatening to end its operations in the province.
Energy Minister Andrew Parsons told media in October of 2020 that estimating the decommissioning costs taxpayers would have to swallow was “premature, given the current status of our offshore projects.” But presentation notes from a month earlier said the province would owe Suncor a royalty refund of about $157 million, due in 2025, if Terra Nova shut down.
By June of 2021, the province’s offshore oil regulator had prepared a communications plan in case Suncor decided to decommission the field, the emails show.
Newfoundland and Labrador ultimately gave the two companies about $246.5 million in direct subsidies, which came from a $320-million transfer from Ottawa aimed at bolstering the sector.
Cenovus got $41.5 million in December 2020 to keep work going on a project that would extend the life of White Rose, while in June 2021 Suncor was given $205 million in direct cash and the province took a royalty cut worth $300 million to keep work going on Terra Nova.
Both Suncor and Cenovus posted significant 2022 profits last week, at $9.1 billion and $11.4 billion, respectively.
Mabee said that in retrospect, it would have been good for the province to impose conditions on those subsidies requiring the companies to pay them back if oil prices rebounded.
“I think that often, a business that’s on the receiving end of the subsidies, when they’re threatening to walk away, it feels like they’re holding the cards. But in reality, they want the subsidy,” Mabee said. “And they normally don’t want to walk away from long-term investments.”
As energy demand changes and countries move away from oil and gas, there is more volatility ahead for fossil fuel prices, he said, adding that governments should brace for more extreme highs and lows. One way they can better insulate themselves is to build in mechanisms to recoup their subsidies or incentives when markets rebound, he said.
Sara Hastings-Simon, an assistant professor at the University of Calgary studying energy transitions, agrees.
“Simply giving subsidies and not structuring them in a way that’s tied to the price of oil, leaves the public very exposed,” she said in an interview. “We insure the downside risk, and then the private sector gets to keep the upside benefit.”
Mabee noted that despite record oil profits driven by the war in Ukraine, some fossil fuel companies haven’t announced larger investments in low-carbon energy. Governments should make their financial help during downtowns contingent on investments in a net-zero future, he said.
“The oil and gas industry has to change to get us there. And this is a lever that we could be using to help affect that change,” he said. “This is the moment. It’s that subsidy moment when you actually have power.”
This report by The Canadian Press was first published Feb. 21, 2023.
